Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Food Glorious Food

Food Glorious food
We're anxious to try it

Three banquets a day

Our favorite diet
From the musical "Oliver!" Written and composed by Lionel Bart (1930-1999)


I have three recent stories that I think might be worth sharing.  The theme is "food":

How the Japanese Diet Became the Japanese Diet
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/food-matters/how-the-japanese-diet-became-the-japanese-diet/

I feel the need to quibble a bit about this article. The idea that Japan completely "transformed its diet" after World War II is a little bit hyperbolic. Sushi dates back more than a thousand years; the form of sushi we see today dates back to the mid 19th century. Miso goes back into pre-history. Deep frying became common more than 400 years ago ("tempura" comes from "tempora," Latin for "time periods"; for religious reasons, the Portuguese avoided meat during Lent and on Fridays). 

Yes, the author clearly shows that modern Japanese cuisine is very different from what existed before World War II, but I'm not quite sold on the idea that there's been a wholesale reshaping.




Why spicy food may be the secret to a longer life
http://www.livescience.com/51743-spicy-food-linked-with-longer-life.html
http://mashable.com/2015/08/05/spicy-food-longer-life/#kvg2mcbWYPqn

Recent research in China seems to show that eating spicy food may lead "to a slightly lower risk of an earlier death." 

There are problems with the study. I don't know what they mean by "spicy." This is a self-reported study (which means you're trusting people's memories). And the authors do make it clear that this was an observational study, not one that looks for a causal relationship.

Still, it did involve 500,000 people over a period of seven years, and that's pretty impressive. Pass the Sriracha!





Are we what we eat? Evidence of vegetarian diet permanently shaping human genome to change individual risk of cancer, heart disease https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160329184939.htm; http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/03/09/molbev.msw049.full.pdf+html


This is moderately cutting-edge stuff. What it boils down to, is the idea that people who, for generations, have eaten a vegetarian diet, have acquired a mutation that makes it crucial for them to eat diets rich in omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. If they don't -- if they start eating meat or even just an unbalanced diet -- they run an increased risk of heart disease and colon cancer.




That's it for now. Hope you find these interesting!

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

"My hovercraft is full of eels"

"Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook," John Cleese. From Monty Python's Flying Circus, Series 2, Episode 12, "Spam," originally aired December 15, 1970. Transcript available: http://www.montypython.net/scripts/phrasebk.php

There are free and wild spirits out there who go where the wind blows them, caring not whither they may roam. Money? Hotel? Language? Hah! They are FREE! Such things are not worth fretting about! Just go!

Yeah.  Good luck with that.

Most of us make some kind of effort to learn something about our destination. Climate. History. Useful phrases. Cultural sensitivities. What gestures that are innocuous here are deeply obscene there. Something.

All of which means guidebooks. Which have been around for a very long time.

The "Seven Wonders of the World" basically date back well over two thousand years, and were a kind of itinerary for Greek (and later Roman) travelers (or as Patsy Cline put it, "See the pyramids along the Nile/Watch the sunrise from a tropic isle/Just remember darling all the while/You belong to me").

Guidebooks and travelogues became a popular literary tradition. One of the great travel books was "The Periplus of the Erythraen Sea," a guide to the ports of the Eastern Mediterranean, Red Sea ("Erythraen" = "Eritrean"), East Africa, and the Indian Ocean, written about 2,000 years ago (you can read the text [in translation] here: http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/periplus.asp).  You can find a nice, non-technical discussion of some of these early travel guides here: http://archive.aramcoworld.com/pdf/2000/200504.pdf).

Guidebooks for Medieval Pilgrims to Jerusalem were hugely popular, and travel literature was popular about the same time in China. Starting in the 16th and 17th centuries cultured Europeans began taking "Grand Tours," and guidebooks were crucial for the young rich idiots who wanted to acquire a "practical" education.

The first guidebook produced for travelers in the United States was apparently Gideon Minor Davison's "The Fashionable Tour," in 1822 (you can find the book here: http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/gideon-m-gideon-miner-davison/the-fashionable-tour--a-guide-to-travellers-visiting-the-middle-and-northern-st-iva.shtml). Today one of the liveliest areas of any book store is going to be the travel guide area. No matter where you're going, there's a guidebook.

What if you're not traveling from the US? What if you're traveling to the US? What kind of advice is given to travelers coming here?

It's an interesting question. And one which is a lot harder to answer than you might think.

For one thing, guidebooks for foreigners are written for foreigners. In foreign languages. Which I don't read. For another, they're not generally for sale here in the good ol' US of A. But a little sleuthing turns up a number of short online excerpts (a list of the guidebooks excerpts is at the bottom of this post).

Just going through these, it's possible to note some common observations about America and Americans:
  • Driving: Americans are apparently very obedient when it comes to driving, according to the guides from Japan, Ireland and Australia. This, however, isn't necessarily a good thing. Since we focus on "rules" we're not necessarily all that good at paying attention to what's going on around us.
  • Smiling/Friendliness/Laughing: It seems we smile. A lot. A lot. It may not mean all that much, but we are constantly, aggressively, maniacally cheerful. Apparently this frightens and confuses people.
  • Eating/Portion Size/Doggy Bags: The French, the Japanese, and oddly enough the Irish seem appalled that American portions are not miserly. Reading the "advice" made me feel like I was being scolded. And our lack of shame at taking food home in a "doggy bag" was also something that brought disapproval (the portions are large, we don't try and eat it all there, we take some home -- seems reasonable to me).
  • Sales Tax: The fact that price tags don't show what you'll actually pay infuriates people from the UK, Australia and Ireland. Especially since taxes vary from state to state (even city to city) in the US. In our defense, I'll point out that they rarely vary all that much -- the difference between 8.75% and 7.5% isn't likely to bankrupt a traveler. Unless they're that free spirit I mentioned above.
  • Tipping: Equally infuriating to folks from Britain, Australia and Ireland is the idea of a semi-obligatory tip. It's not entirely their fault; many people here in the US aren't aware that the minimum wage laws aren't the same when it comes to food service. In many parts of the country the minimum wage for food servers is $2.13. In Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming it's under $3.00 per hour. Theoretically employers are supposed to make up any difference between the "tipped wage" and the regular minimum wage (nationally $7.25/hour), but let's just say that doesn't always happen.
There were some other interesting observations. The Chinese apparently need to be reminded that Americans have rather large personal space (and use gestures), so they need to keep their distance. Folks from the UK are warned that they may need to purchase medical insurance. Several writers commented on our National Parks (positively) and how "sensitive" we are (negatively).

These are excerpts from an extremely limited sample. But one thing to consider: Do these observations seem reasonable? If not -- how much credence should you give guidebooks?

Selected references:

http://mentalfloss.com/article/55140/10-japanese-travel-tips-visiting-america
http://mentalfloss.com/article/54461/4-russian-travel-tips-visiting-america
http://mentalfloss.com/article/55306/11-french-travel-tips-visiting-america
http://www.bbcamerica.com/anglophenia/2014/05/summer-america-10-pieces-advice-visiting-brits
http://mentalfloss.com/article/55717/12-chinese-travel-tips-visiting-america
http://www.roughguides.com/article/18-things-everyone-should-know-before-visiting-the-usa/
http://mentalfloss.com/article/62180/8-german-travel-tips-visiting-america
http://www.traveller.com.au/usa-travel-tips-20-surprising-things-visitors-will-discover-ggyxww
http://www.takenbythewind.com/2015/01/13/travel-advice-other-countries-give-to-people-visiting-the-usa/
http://www.fluentin3months.com/usa-clashes/

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Three Little Words

Oh what I'd give for that wonderful phrase
To hear those three little words
That's all I'd live for the rest of my days


"Three Little Words" by Harry Ruby, lyrics by Bert Kalmar, published in 1930 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61rdIn2IGJI).


I came across a very odd website recently. The folks there have come up with a very weird answer to a very real problem.

[Did you notice how I wrote "very" three times in that first line? I'll explain why later.]

The problem: Where are you? Or, a little more explicitly, how do you define your location?

There are several different ways to define location. They usually come down to:
  • Site: "On the bay where it smells so bad, near the headland where the polluted creek flows into the sea."
  • Situation: "Near the farmhouse where they found all those bodies."
  • Mathematical: 19.409214° N, 155.283380° W (want to see this location? Click here).
Site is sometimes called "fixed" or "physical" location, situation is also known as "relative location," and mathematical location is also known as "absolute location." A slightly different way of talking about location would be in terms of "locality" (an area with a well-defined name but not much specificity -- when you tell someone you're from California, you've told them something, but not very much).

Regardless of how you define it, we all need to know where we are (and we need to be able to tell other people where we are).

So what's the problem?

Well most of the world is uninhabited, so it's not always easy to use site and situation ("I put the treasure under a white rock near a dead tree" may not be all that helpful after a few years). You can always use mathematical locations, but let's face it, even if you're a geographer you can't really visualize 19.409214° N, 155.283380° W, or 21.324309°N 157.925366°W (they're near each other, but quite different -- one has much better restrooms).

Computers easily use latitude and longitude. People have a lot more trouble. Computers can memorize a string of numbers like "+19.414073-155.288372." People have a smidgen more difficulty. That's one reason we use addresses (street addresses and postal codes, like "5905 Lake Earl Drive, Crescent City, CA 95532," for example) to tell people where we are (by the way, if somebody gives that as their home address, RUN AWAY!)

The thing is, there are a lot of inhabited places around the world that don't really have "addresses." Somebody living in a favela [slum] of Rio de Janeiro or an isolated cattle station in Australia's outback may be able to get mail (using a PO box or a friend or something), but that doesn't tell you where they really are.

To deal with this situation: what3words. What they've done, briefly, is divide the globe's 196.9 million square miles into 75 trillion 3x3 meter squares. They then have an algorithm that assigns three random (or near random) words to every square. The result:

  • 19.409214° N, 155.283380° W becomes "outwards.works.partnered". 
  • 21.324309°N 157.925366°W becomes "shovels.outsiders.mopey". 
  • "5905 Lake Earl Drive, Crescent City, CA 95532" becomes "crisps.modifies.passageway" (and if somebody gives this as their location, you should still RUN AWAY!).

Some more examples:
  • Badwater, Death Valley National Park: interactions.hopeful.geek
  • Delicate Arch, in Arches National Park: bunny.sunbathing.branch
  • The entrance to Disneyland (the "Happiest Place on Earth"): contact.bright.miss
  • The summit of Mt. Everest: slink.equestrian.canteens
  • The center of the Golden Gate Bridge: super.skirt.letter
  • The New York Stock Exchange: wide.miss.slave
  • The Royal Observatory, Greenwich (where 0° Latitude and 0° Longitude meet): oval.blast improving
  • The San Diego Zoo: neck.giant.resist
  • The White House: sulk.held.raves
  • And my office: covers.bottom.dangerously (seriously, that's the location).
The idea is that you can use just three words, especially in uninhabited or “unaddressed” places, to specify a location. You enter them into a properly equipped GPS device (or computer, or just the what3words website) and it will tell you how to get there.

There are a number of people who have started using this technique, among them emergency crews (“There’s an injured man at 25.847396°N 81.334165°W” may be confusing; “There’s an injured man at straddling.collider.both” may still be confusing, but it is easier to say).

It’s an intriguing idea, but I’m not sure how practical it is. The basic issues:
  • You can’t see relationships. I may not instinctively know where 19.409214° N, 155.283380° W and  21.324309°N 157.925366°W are, but I can tell that the first is south and east of the second.
  • You need software -- a computer, a GPS device, something -- to interpret the three words. Which is kind of what you already need. So how does this make things easier?
  • It’s a proprietary system, using a proprietary algorithm. The company could fold tomorrow (not likely, but possible). It’s not clear to me what would happen then.
  • This may just be me, but it drives me crazy that I can’t enter latitude and longitude data and get back three words! A street address, sure. Even a fairly vague phrase like “the white house” can get you reasonably close. But you need specialized software to translate from coordinate data to three words (you can get a developer license, and if programming is what you do to relax, have at it).
It’s certainly interesting. I’m not sure if it really solves a problem or not. But it is interesting.

Oh, and remember how I used three “verys” at the beginning of this essay? Well, it is possible for what3words, since it’s random, to use the same word three times to make what have got to be the easiest geocodes in the world to remember.  Some examples:
  • birds.birds.birds (just north of a housing development called "The Rye," Epsom, Surrey, England)
  • cats.cats.cats (on the railroad tracks a little bit southeast of the intersection of Hartwick Highway and North Wayne Street in Lincoln Park MI)
  • dogs.dogs.dogs (in the hills just west of the California State Prison, Solano, in Vacaville CA)
  • fish.fish.fish (near some storage tanks off of Schuykill Avenue in Philadelphia PA)
  • turtle.turtle.turtle (a forested area near Milan MO)
And where is "very.very.very"? Well, as it turns out there is no “very.very.very”. The closest I could get was “every.every.every” which is in the suburbs of Sydney, Australia.

Hey, I tried.

If you’re interested, go to http://what3words.com/.  You might find someplace you really belong -- see where “heaven.heaven.heaven” takes you!



For more information see:

http://what3wordscom/
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/plan-replace-geographic-coordinates-earth-unique-strings-three-words-180949946/?no-ist
http://www.vicchi.org/2015/03/02/reinventing-the-geocoder-with-just-three-words/
http://techcrunch.com/2015/11/03/what3words-series-a/
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32444811


Thursday, April 7, 2016

Only the beginning

Only the beginning of what I want to feel forever.
Only the beginning. Only just the start.
Chicago, "Beginnings," by Robert Lamm, from the album The Chicago Transit Authority, 1969

Just a small point that will interest probably no one.

In the process of setting up this blog I found myself searching desperately for as much information as I could find. Now Google has provided various help files and sources of assistance (they're not all especially helpful, but at least they've made the effort). Among these are videos on YouTube giving advice on a bunch of different things -- Google+ Hangouts, social media, etc.

Sounds good, right? And some of them really are quite good. But what's interesting are the things in the sidebar. These are "Related channels" to which, presumably based on my search history, they think I might want to subscribe. So, being a reasonable person, you'd kind of assume that they'd be related to Google, or Blogger, or websites, or something, right?

Right?

Again, bear in mind I came here looking for information on implementing Blogger. The "related channels" are

  • Justin Bieber on VEVO 
  • Myanmar Celebrity TV 
  • Axl Mulat [subsequent research shows that Mr. Mulat has made videos on web design, so that's at least potentially relevant] 
  • Alphabet Investor Relations 
  • Google Help 
  • Google Reader 

The last two (and Mr. Mulat's endeavours) are at least marginally relevant. The others? I haven't a clue why they're there.

Either Google's algorithms are less brilliant than we've all come to believe, or they know things about me of which I'm unaware.

Oh my God, that's it, isn't it? My long-hidden desire to learn more about Myanmar celebrities and Justin Bieber are finally coming out. And the investment people are there to help me buy ... Justin Bieber stuff?

Maybe not. But considering the way everybody exhorts the owner of a new blog to optimize their access to search engines and target their products -- and this is the way Google itself behaves -- it kind of makes me suspect that things are a lot more random than some people like to believe.

I usually like random. I think of it as a lifestyle. But this is just weird.